January 31, 2008
10:46 am PST
Super Tuesday – Los Angeles County Ballot for February 5, 2008
Amazingly, people have actually inquired as to why I haven’t put up my choices. So here they are:
Proposition 91 Transportation Funds
NO. No longer needed since 1A passed last time around.
Proposition 92 Community Colleges. Funding. Governance. Fees
NO. Lowering fees is nice, but locking in funds to do it isn’t. Besides, those who can’t afford the fees get fee waivers already, so why is this an issue? We already have quite a bit of state money locked into education (check out where Lotto money goes). This is spurious to us but grants control of funds to certain interested parties outside of the state government. No, really, we elected these officials to handle state funds, not to education lobbyists.
Proposition 93 Limits on Legislators’ Terms in Office
YES. I like what the LA Times said about this, and I’m paraphrasing: even if it gives a few slimeballs an extra two years in office, it also means better term limit rules in perpetuity (or until the next proposition comes along to amend this one). Right now, you can serve a total of 14 years, 6 in the senate and 8 in the assembly. This makes it so you serve a total of 12, regardless of where, so some might spend all 12 in the senate. Considering how long U.S. senators spend in the senate, I don’t see why this is a big deal — in fact, it means that a senator or an assemblyman could dedicated themselves to 12 years of service in one office, giving them experience and the ability to make change while still keeping them to a short enough term so as to prevent any sort of permanent control. Sure, this means some incumbents get to last longer, but so what? We can endure another two or so lame duck years and in return get a reasonable term limit rule for our state government.
Proposition 94 Amendment to Indian Gaming Compact
Proposition 95 Amendment to Indian Gaming Compact
Proposition 96 Amendment to Indian Gaming Compact
Proposition 97 Amendment to Indian Gaming Compact
YES. This expands the number of machines and increases the annual payments to the state by the four tribes with a gaming compact. Look, people want to gamble. If we didn’t have these resorts in California, people will go to Nevada, and Nevada gets a percentage instead of California. Screw that. Let it ride. As to other tribes getting economically devastated… find a better business or join the same business. In this regard, capitalism works. What I would like to see, though, is a proposition that establishes more state presence in dealing with addicted gamblers. Maybe next ballot.
Measure S Reduction of Tax Rate and Modernization of Communications Users Tax — City of Los Angeles
YES. I was a bit wary about this, since it meant extending the tax to all forms of communication, not just landlines. Since federal law prevents taxation of the internet, anyone who still wants to avoid paying taxes will just have to use Skype. Meanwhile, I love my city and I don’t mind this tax if it helps keep it running.
Now, as to the presidential primary. Well, the Republican Party decided to withhold their love for undeclared, non-party Americans like myself. Unlike previous elections, where undeclared, non-party members were invited to participate in a Republican primary, this year we are not. So I’m stuck with voting for a Democrat.
I’m voting for Obama.
Had I the choice, I’m actually pretty sure I’d've participated in the Democratic primary anyway, especially since McCain seems to be doing so well that he really doesn’t need my vote to win California. Yes, I am angling so as to have an Obama versus McCain fight in November. As far as I’m concerned, either of the two are the best of the lot, and I figure on being pretty happy with the outcome no matter what.


February 4th, 2008 at 7:15 pm
thanks… i was wondering about this… i really rely on it! loveyou!
February 4th, 2008 at 7:21 pm
billary! billary! billary!
February 5th, 2008 at 8:47 pm
it’s all up to california now!